One of these is the small end of the biggest name in the category. The other is a focused product for teams that sell by telephone. The interesting part is that the focused one has more room in it.
A general product cut down, against one built for a job
Close ships a power dialler, call recording and two-way email sync in the product itself, and makes custom objects and single sign-on available on ordinary tiers rather than holding them for enterprise. Close scores 4 for pipeline depth against Salesforce Starter's 3.
Salesforce Starter arrives already believing in leads, opportunities and forecasts, with custom objects, quotes, forecasting and single sign-on included and the largest partner ecosystem in the category behind it. Salesforce Starter scores 4 for integrations and Close scores 4 as well, so the ecosystem advantage is about who else knows the product rather than what it connects to.
Where each one stops being enough
Close scores 4 for scale headroom against Salesforce Starter's 3, which is not the direction the two brands suggest. The reason is what the next step is. Close publishes all four rungs of its ladder — nine, thirty-five, ninety-nine and one hundred and thirty-nine dollars — with both billing terms shown, so growth is a plan change you can price today.
Above Salesforce Starter, everything is a sales-led purchase. There is no self-serve rung, so the step up is a negotiation, and transaction fees apply on top of the published seat price in the meantime.
Close's own catch is the telephone it is built around: calling is charged on usage on top of the seat price, so a team that dials heavily should model that as a separate line rather than reading the seat price as the bill. There is also no free plan, and the trial carries only five dollars of calling credit.
Which should you choose?
Choose Close if your team sells by phone, or if you want a published ladder you can climb without talking to anybody. Choose Salesforce Starter if the ecosystem is the point — because your people, your partners or your other systems are already in it.
If neither the usage-billed calling nor the sales-led step appeals, Pipedrive includes calling at a fixed seat price and publishes every rung.

Salesforce Starter
A published price and a signup button, unlike the rest of the range.

Close
Calling and email built in, for teams that sell by phone.
Specs
Ratings
Ease of setup
Pipeline depth
Integrations
Scale headroom
Value
Features
Pricing
Salesforce Starter
Close
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving Salesforce Starter or Close.
Comparison


Salesforce Starter vs Zoho Bigin
Both are the small-team doorway into a very large suite. Zoho Bigin scores 5 for value against Salesforce Starter's 3, and costs a third as much.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs Close
Two sales-first CRMs that disagree about the telephone. Compared on entry price, what calling costs, and where each one gates the mailbox.
Comparison


HubSpot Sales Hub vs Salesforce Starter
The two names on every shortlist, and both are entry points into much larger platforms. What differs is what it costs when the entry point stops fitting.
Comparison


monday CRM vs Close
One arrives configurable and waits for you to model your process. The other arrives with an opinion about how selling works and a dialler already in it.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs Salesforce Starter
Pipedrive scores 5 for ease of setup and Salesforce Starter 3. The question is whether you are buying the product you can run now or the name above it.
Comparison


HubSpot Sales Hub vs Close
HubSpot scores 5 for pipeline depth and starts free. Close puts a power dialler in the product, and charges for the calls on top of the seat price.