Both of these are built for people whose job title contains the word sales, both publish every tier, and neither pretends to be a platform. The difference is what they assume you do all day. Pipedrive assumes you move deals across a board. Close assumes you pick up the phone.
What the entry tier actually contains
Pipedrive's Lite is US$14 a seat and is deliberately spare: leads, deals, contacts, a calendar and imports. Full mailbox sync, automation and forecast reports all begin at Growth, US$39 a seat, which is the tier most teams end up on.
Close starts lower on paper — Solo/Essentials at US$9 a seat on an annual plan — and puts two-way email sync in the product rather than behind an upgrade. Growth is US$35, Scale US$99, Enterprise US$139. Custom objects and single sign-on appear rather than being reserved for a negotiation, which is unusual this far down a price list.
So on the mailbox, the cheaper product is also the more generous one. On depth of pipeline configuration, the comparison reverses.
The telephone, and what it costs
This is the axis that should decide it. Close ships a dialler, call recording and a power dialler as part of the product, so a rep works a call list without leaving the record. Pipedrive treats telephony as something you connect.
The catch is that native does not mean included. Close bills calling minutes on usage on top of the seat price, and the free trial carries only five dollars of calling credit. The published per-seat figure is a floor. For a team making a hundred calls a day that is still the right shape of bill; for a team making five, you are paying for infrastructure you barely touch.
Pipedrive's approach costs more to assemble and less to ignore. If nobody on the team dials, none of it is on the invoice.
Which should you choose?
Choose Close if outbound calling is the motion — if there is a list, and somebody works it, and the recording matters afterwards. The seat price is competitive and the mailbox is not held hostage, and the usage billing is fair when the usage is real.
Choose Pipedrive if selling happens mostly in writing, or if you want the pipeline itself to be the thing you tune. Budget for Growth rather than Lite, because the entry tier without mailbox sync is not the product you are actually comparing.

Pipedrive
Sales pipelines done properly, with very little else in the way.

Close
Calling and email built in, for teams that sell by phone.
Specs
Ratings
Ease of setup
Pipeline depth
Integrations
Scale headroom
Value
Features
Pricing
Pipedrive
Close
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving Pipedrive or Close.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs monday CRM
One is a sales pipeline with very little else in the way; the other is a work platform with a CRM on it. That difference decides most of this.
Comparison


monday CRM vs Close
One arrives configurable and waits for you to model your process. The other arrives with an opinion about how selling works and a dialler already in it.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs HubSpot Sales Hub
One has no free plan and a low entry price; the other is free forever and expensive later. Compared on tiers, gating and what each costs at scale.
Comparison


HubSpot Sales Hub vs Close
HubSpot scores 5 for pipeline depth and starts free. Close puts a power dialler in the product, and charges for the calls on top of the seat price.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs Salesforce Starter
Pipedrive scores 5 for ease of setup and Salesforce Starter 3. The question is whether you are buying the product you can run now or the name above it.
Comparison


Salesforce Starter vs Close
A cut-down enterprise CRM against a product built for one job. Close scores 4 for scale headroom against Salesforce Starter's 3, which reverses the branding.