These two answer the same question in opposite ways. monday CRM asks what your sales process looks like. Close tells you what it thinks a sales process looks like and hands you a telephone.
Configure it yourself, or take the opinion
monday CRM gives you unlimited pipelines, contacts and boards on the entry tier and expects you to shape them. That is genuine flexibility if you have a process worth modelling and somebody willing to model it, and an empty afternoon if you do not. Sources also disagree on which tier makes its automation usable, which is an uncomfortable thing to be uncertain about while you are the one building it.
Close arrives already believing in a calling-led pipeline, with custom objects and single sign-on available on ordinary tiers rather than reserved for enterprise. monday CRM scores 4 for pipeline depth and Close scores 4 as well, so this is a difference in shape rather than in depth.
Calling, and who pays for it by the minute
Close's power dialler, call recording and two-way email sync are in the product rather than assembled from integrations. If your team works a list by phone, nothing about monday CRM replaces that.
The cost is that calling is charged on usage on top of the seat price. Close's ladder is published at nine, thirty-five, ninety-nine and one hundred and thirty-nine dollars with both billing terms shown, but the dialler is a separate line that scales with how much you actually sell.
monday CRM's pricing is opaque in a different way: a three-seat minimum makes the eighteen-dollar entry tier fifty-four dollars a month, and the top tier is priced on request. Close scores 3 for value against monday CRM's 2.
monday CRM scores 4 for integrations and 4 for scale headroom, and Close scores 4 on both as well, so neither is the one you outgrow first.
Which should you choose?
Choose Close if the telephone is central to how you sell, or if you would rather buy a decided process than design one. Choose monday CRM if your team already works on monday boards, or your process is unusual enough that an opinionated CRM would fight you.
If the process is conventional and the phone is not central, both of these are more product than you need, and Pipedrive or Zoho Bigin will cost less and take less setting up.

monday CRM
Quoting and visual boards from the entry tier, in blocks of three seats.

Close
Calling and email built in, for teams that sell by phone.
Specs
Ratings
Ease of setup
Pipeline depth
Integrations
Scale headroom
Value
Features
Pricing
monday CRM
Close
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving monday CRM or Close.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs monday CRM
One is a sales pipeline with very little else in the way; the other is a work platform with a CRM on it. That difference decides most of this.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs Close
Two sales-first CRMs that disagree about the telephone. Compared on entry price, what calling costs, and where each one gates the mailbox.
Comparison


HubSpot Sales Hub vs monday CRM
A free-tier platform against a board-based CRM that puts quoting and automation on its entry plan. Compared on gating, caps and what the top tier costs.
Comparison


HubSpot Sales Hub vs Close
HubSpot scores 5 for pipeline depth and starts free. Close puts a power dialler in the product, and charges for the calls on top of the seat price.
Comparison


Salesforce Starter vs monday CRM
Both are sold on growing with you, from opposite ends — a cut-down enterprise CRM against a general work platform. Neither costs what its price page says.
Comparison


Salesforce Starter vs Close
A cut-down enterprise CRM against a product built for one job. Close scores 4 for scale headroom against Salesforce Starter's 3, which reverses the branding.