These two are built around different ideas of how selling happens. HubSpot assumes the conversation starts in an inbox and a form. Close assumes it starts on the phone. Which assumption matches your team is most of this decision.
Selling by email against selling by phone
Close ships a power dialler, call recording and two-way email sync inside the product rather than as an integration you assemble. For a team that works a list by telephone, that is the difference between a CRM and a tool.
HubSpot Sales Hub scores 5 for pipeline depth against Close's 4, and 5 for integrations against Close's 4. Its mailbox integration and tracking go right down into the free tools, and it has web forms and meeting booking that Close does not match. Close answers with custom objects and single sign-on available on ordinary tiers rather than held back for enterprise, which is rarer than it sounds.
Free to begin, and the step after it
HubSpot has a free tier with a real deal pipeline, then Starter at seven dollars a seat billed annually. Close has no free plan and its trial includes only five dollars of calling credit, so evaluating it properly costs something.
Then the direction reverses. HubSpot's Professional tier is roughly thirteen times the Starter per-seat price and carries a required one-time onboarding fee of fifteen hundred dollars. Close's ladder runs nine, thirty-five, ninety-nine and one hundred and thirty-nine dollars, all four rungs published with both billing terms shown, and no onboarding fee.
Close's own catch is the dialler: calling is charged on usage on top of the seat price, so a team that calls heavily should model that separately rather than reading the seat price as the bill. Close scores 3 for value and HubSpot Sales Hub scores 3 too, and they get there by opposite routes — one cheap to start and expensive to grow, the other the reverse.
Which should you choose?
Choose Close if your team sells by phone and you want the dialler, the recording and the email sync to be one product. Choose HubSpot Sales Hub if you want to start free, your selling happens mostly in writing, or you need the deeper pipeline and the wider integration set.
If the phone matters but the usage-based calling does not appeal, Pipedrive includes calling and publishes every tier of its ladder at a fixed seat price.

HubSpot Sales Hub
Free until you outgrow it, then priced like the platform it is.

Close
Calling and email built in, for teams that sell by phone.
Specs
Ratings
Ease of setup
Pipeline depth
Integrations
Scale headroom
Value
Features
Pricing
HubSpot Sales Hub
Close
Related comparisons
More head-to-head matchups
Explore other comparisons involving HubSpot Sales Hub or Close.
Comparison


HubSpot Sales Hub vs Salesforce Starter
The two names on every shortlist, and both are entry points into much larger platforms. What differs is what it costs when the entry point stops fitting.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs Close
Two sales-first CRMs that disagree about the telephone. Compared on entry price, what calling costs, and where each one gates the mailbox.
Comparison


HubSpot Sales Hub vs Zoho Bigin
Two large vendors' small products, both with free tiers and low entry prices. Compared on what the free plan holds and what happens above it.
Comparison


monday CRM vs Close
One arrives configurable and waits for you to model your process. The other arrives with an opinion about how selling works and a dialler already in it.
Comparison


Pipedrive vs HubSpot Sales Hub
One has no free plan and a low entry price; the other is free forever and expensive later. Compared on tiers, gating and what each costs at scale.
Comparison


Salesforce Starter vs Close
A cut-down enterprise CRM against a product built for one job. Close scores 4 for scale headroom against Salesforce Starter's 3, which reverses the branding.